JCally JM6

DAC Chip: Conexant (Synaptics) CX31993 (Single)
PCM 32bit – 384khz, SNR: -117dB, Power: Unspecified, USB Type-C Male, 3.5mm SE (Microphone: YES), 5g, Aluminum Chassis with OFC Cable



  • Clean neutral and natural timbre
  • Great coherent dynamics
  • Great Treble textures and extensions with polished smooth decays
  • Strong Mid-Bass responses, richly textured density and decays
  • Neutral Mids slightly intimate, richly textured and smooth.
  • Mild Sub-Bass with smooth decays
  • Crisp details retrieval, highly transparent
  • Realistic toned guitars, cello, percussions, and piano
  • Great speed and transients handling, amazing dexterity
  • Properly sized soundstage, commendably holographic spatial imaging
  • Clean separation of layers with precise placement
  • Great synergy with many type of IEMs/HPs/Earbuds
  • Great on poor quality recordings and Lo-Fi music despite being very transparent
  • Great sibilance resistance all the time
  • Clean black background even on sensitive Hybrids (CVJ CSK)
  • Efficient battery drain


  • Being this cheap, there’s potential QC issue and consistencies. As with many cheap Chifi items
  • No mechanical volume adjuster
  • No Balanced Output
  • Construction and build appearance seems less durable
  • Needed 90/100 volume for normal loudness on T40RP MK3
  • Driving power not as great as others, need higher volume on demanding pairing


JCally JM6. This is the second CX31993 that I have tested. I have spent huge amount of time with CX-PRO 31993, I have spent equally huge amount of time as well with this JM6. There’s no mistaking that well balanced neutral sound signature, clean and crisp throughout the dynamic range. As with CX-PRO I will still regard JM6 as a bit more exciting in sonic approach, works greatly to inject life into the music especially for sensitive IEMs and Earbuds.

While sounding good on more demanding pairings, JM6 does not shine the best with the likes of FOSTEX T40RP MK3 and TIN HiFi P1 magnetic planars. Dynamic range was not as extended as how I like it. On my 45Ω 98db Etymotic ER4SR and VE Asura 2.0 155Ω, that’s the limit for JM6 for great synergy. ER4SR and Asura both being natively competent with technicalities and transparency, sounded great with rich density in note weight and remained musical for prolonged listening. However worth to mention that strangely my Monk GO which runs on lower impedance does not seem to sound as great, something off with the balance which makes them somewhat dull sounding, perhaps Monk GO being a bit too flat haha.

The crowning moment for JM6, pairing with VE Duke MK1, HZSOUND Heart Mirror, Moondrop Aria and Shure KSE1500 (as AUX). It was evident to my ears the spectrum of sound is totally wholesome, full of rich and well textured Mids, Bass and Treble, smooth crisp decays. JM6 does not alter the sound unique to each IEMs, and this is a huge plus as I prefer my Aria to remain warm with Harman curve and Heart Mirror with smooth sparkly brightness. Timbre hygiene admirably clean and coherent with no signs of nasty jitters or frequency bleeding. Absolute bliss with VE Duke MK1 in 16Ω mode, spacious soundstage that’s even wider than Aria’s, rich detailed and textured Treble which I enjoyed immensely. Well, Mid-Bass wasn’t as visceral sounding as how it is with the 5 Star performers, but then I was never a fan of rich dense bass so I am perfectly fine with this, especially when the focus was on that sweet smooth highs and neutral Mids.

All in all, JM6 is as great sounding as it is with CX-PRO, with only the following differences that I can tell of:

JCally JM6 vs CX-PRO 31993

  • JM6 uses OFC vs CX-PRO SPC
  • JM6 slightly less euphonic vs CX-PRO (CX-PRO slightly more energetic and sparkier, JM6 smoother, well balanced and polished)
  • JM6 has even better sibilance tolerance vs CX-PRO
  • JM6 build and construction looks weaker vs CX-PRO


Best Pairing: Anything below 160Ω or above 98db sensitivity.

Back to #donglemadness


  1. Tommy says:

    Hi, It’s me again. Do you think this JM6 can drive Tin T4 and Senfer DT6 well?


    1. Andy.EF says:

      Sorry no idea. Anything that I haven’t try I would not know how they synergize


      1. Tommy says:

        I am getting the hissing issue on driving Senfer DT6 when pairing with TRN T1 cable. But with JCALLY JC08S cable, no hissing was detected. So Weird!


  2. Iroaseta says:

    Hello! I was trying to find a dongle with a tight budget and it seems like Jm6 and CX-pro are the best for their price:performance ratio. However I’m unsure which one should I get. I listen to mostly orchestral instrumental/video games tracks that have more than 5 types of music instruments so separation is rather important to me. I also listen to female vocals more than male vocals. Build quality wouldn’t be a huge issue as I tend to sit down and listen instead of moving around. The IEM I’m using is Tanchjim Tanya which has 16ohm and 112 sensitivity if that helps but it doesn’t look like it’ll be an issue based on your description. Thank you!


    1. Andy.EF says:

      For your usage you would be better served using Avani/Xumee. Better and cleaner separation lines with great silent background for sensitive IEMs


      1. Iroaseta says:

        Thank you for the reply! May I know this is the Avani you’re talking about?


        Thank you!


  3. Akshaya says:

    Hello, is this already good to drive HZSound Heart Mirror? Considering it’s on the top 25 and from what i heard Heart Mirror need some power to bring it’s potential? Thanks before


    1. Andy.EF says:

      HM is not as hard to drive as many perceive it to be. But yes JM6 can drive it well. But I would use Avani or JM04Pro instead because JM6 can be already a brighter sounding source


      1. Akshaya says:

        Thanks for the reply! Really appreciate it.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Alif says:

    Hi, does jm6 ideal for trn mt1 pro sound character ?


    1. Andy.EF says:

      Yes it will work great with MT1 Pro


    2. Jovovichvan says:

      Hi sir
      Jcally jm6 is better than jcally jm08?
      I have already jm08 and now wanna buy jm6.
      My iems are blon bl03 and kz zex pro.


      1. Andy.EF says:

        Yes it js slightly better


  5. Mit says:

    I’m considering JM04Pro and JM6 to pair with CCA CRA, I aim to the flat/neutral sound as most as possible. Could you tell me which one? How are they different?


    1. Andy.EF says:

      Both are neutral with dynamics frequency, as would any good DAC/Amp should be. JM6 which is similar to CX-PRO and Abigail, will appear less “warm” compared to JM04Pro. Since you are using CRA, then it will surely work better with Avani, Xumee or JM04Pro


Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s